Sometimes I wonder if people who lived long ago had naturally quieter
minds. I remember a line from the Bhagavad Gita about how noisy the mind is –
and that was written about 2000 years ago. Perhaps people's minds were just as
busy thousands of years ago as they are today. You’d think they were a little
less busy though. Here’s that Gita quote, "Krishna, the mind is restless,
turbulent, powerful, violent; trying to control it is like trying to tame the
wind.” Krishna responds that it is difficult to silence the mind, but not
impossible.
But is it necessary (for enlightenment)? The short answer, at least my
answer is – I don’t know. Well that wasn’t very helpful was it?
Okay here’s a longer answer (not a really long answer, don’t worry). I
suspect it works like this: Non-identification with thought (which is necessary for enlightenment) is a result of becoming
aware of thought through meditation. And silence of the mind tends to be a result of this process
of non-identification. And although
silence of the mind seems to be a natural and perhaps unavoidable (positive?)
consequence of non-identification, it is not directly a necessary condition for
awakening to occur. Or is it? I still don’t know. This is an open question.
Perhaps I’ll write more on this in a future post.
Tallis